COMMONING EAST TILBURY : Designing an Alternative, Difference-Attuned Methodology for Urban Change
In times where politics, ecological disasters and the grip of “the economy” calls into question how individuals, collective action and design-thinking can enable urban change, this thesis investigates alternative methodologies that allow for critical engagement and the inclusion of difference in relation to architecture and the built environment.
Through an emphasis on balancing theory and practice to develop methodologies that enable agency over the processes of urbanisation, plur-ticipation is based on applying theory around commoning and participation into a propositional pluralistic participation that is tested on site (in East Tilbury) to analyse its ability to involve and address the multiplicity within communities. Key findings are that the data produced from a plur-ticipatory process are revealing of the multitude, but forms part of a symbiotic process in which the results will need to be fed back to the community and (re)read and (re) diffracted to be understood. They are not to be read as individual solutions to a problem, rather expressions of a larger whole. The limitations of the research are considered in relation to sample-size and diversity of the contributors and implications of this work for future research on participatory design should be taken with regard to testing in practice.
Through an emphasis on balancing theory and practice to develop methodologies that enable agency over the processes of urbanisation, plur-ticipation is based on applying theory around commoning and participation into a propositional pluralistic participation that is tested on site (in East Tilbury) to analyse its ability to involve and address the multiplicity within communities. Key findings are that the data produced from a plur-ticipatory process are revealing of the multitude, but forms part of a symbiotic process in which the results will need to be fed back to the community and (re)read and (re) diffracted to be understood. They are not to be read as individual solutions to a problem, rather expressions of a larger whole. The limitations of the research are considered in relation to sample-size and diversity of the contributors and implications of this work for future research on participatory design should be taken with regard to testing in practice.
Dimensions / 176 x 250mm
* Limited run of hard copies in print and risograph coming soon...
Awards/
Distinction in Thesis
Project / MArch (Year 5) Architectural Thesis , Bartlett Unit 13
Thesis Tutors / Dr. Claire McAndrew + Oliver Wilton
Year / 2020